Q:
When you look at the performance of the new car in comparison to
the old car do you think it is doing as well as you had expected?
PM: We are happy with the new car and with the new engine
applied to the F2003-GA and I think we have the potential for further
improvement, that is the normal way of proceeding. We have to start
from a point that may be a step forward and from this position,
with the end of the old car it was almost impossible to make another
development; with the new car we have some more potential for further
improvement.
Q:
With the new engine as well?
PM: Maybe yes, from now until the end of the season, but
considering also that the challenge for the second half of the season
will be more difficult, considering we have to prepare properly
in time for 2004 with the change of regulations, so you also have
to consider the implications in 2003 to be prepared for 2004.
Q:
Now, Renault have two engine teams working leapfrog in a way. Have
you got the same sort of thing at Ferrari?
PM: We have not two separate teams, we have a group of
staff that is dedicated to medium-term development and some that
follow the day by day operation, not two separate organisations
but in the organisation of course we have people dedicated to the
different subjects.
Q:
How difficult is it for you to be working on two programmes at once?
PM: I think this is something different because the step
for next year is different to what it has been in the past. We have
to double the life of the engine so we cannot wait until November,
running the new engine on the dyno for 2004, to be reliable for
the first race and we cannot think to use a development of the previous
engine to use next year. We have to be ready for 2004 with a new
engine with almost double the life, so we have to organise that
in the second half of 2003.