Q:
Did it feel like a pole winning car a couple of weeks ago when you
were still testing in Europe?
MS: It did, to be honest, for Australia, in particular,
because if you look at the statistics we have always been very strong
here in Australia - and then comes Malaysia which is traditionally
a little bit more difficult for us so it did feel good for the first
race.
Q:
Rubens, a great performance. Obviously, you did your time earlier
in the afternoon, what were the track conditions like then?
Rubens Barrichello: Well, the first session, when I went
first, it was very dirty and so I was just carrying the car around
and I knew the potential was there, so in second qualifying I just
pushed as hard as I could. I don't know if the track was better.
It was just a great lap and fortunately, or unfortunately, Michael
beat it by just a little bit. So I am disappointed not to get that
little bit, but I am a happy guy because I pushed as hard as I could.
Q:
This year we have a new rule with 800 kilometres per engine, what
has it been like so far running with new rule?
MS: I have to say that, initially, it sounds very impressive
to go from 300 to 800 kilometres with an engine, but we worked very
hard on that and we have not had too much trouble. It is down to
preparation and our guys have done a great job in that. They worked
well to get the rules 'into account' and do the kilometres and not
lose too much on the power side. In fact, I think we have gained
in this.
Q:
Michael, really an extraordinary start to the season?
MS: Yes it has gone quite well for us and honestly we are
not too surprised by it because Australia has always gone very well
for us and if you take last year we were very strong and I don't
know by how much, we led the time trail, and then we came to Australia
and the thing went completely reversed. So I am obviously concerned
by this and warn that things look good here, but might not be elsewhere.
Q:
And the cars seem so quick on race fuel this afternoon as well?
MS: I think the circuit improved a great deal. We had the
saloon cars out between the sessions this morning and the afternoon
and they put a lot of dust on the circuit and Rubens had to experience
that being the first car, the difference is enormous and a lot,
I guess, is in that.
Q:
Is the new pit lane entrance and speed limit going to make a difference
to strategy tomorrow?
MS: That's a good question I hadn't thought about that.
Q:
Rubens, it's only a fraction of a second difference to Michael,
do you have any idea where you could have caught that up?
RB: It was a good lap and you have to be happy with yourself
and that's it. There is no reason to go and find where I could have
gone faster. It was a good lap for me, overall, and the time was
seriously quick, so the set up was good and the car felt good and
I am second, right now, and looking forward to something better
tomorrow. But, right now, it is good for ourselves.
Q:
And a comment on the one engine rule. Is it making any difference?
RB: Yes, it did. You are running and just 'looking', not
speeding up all the time, on Friday and Saturday and you have to
take care with the motor you have behind you. To be honest, I think
everything is working. I think the only strange thing is the first
qualifying because it seems to be that only 10 per cent of the people
were trying to do a time and the rest were trying to take the car
around (safely) for the second one - because it is too much of a
pain, if you have an off in the first one, and then you don't have
time for the second. It's pretty cool. The one engine rule is no
problem. It is actually better.
QUESTIONS
FROM THE FLOOR
Q:
Michael did you change your line in the last turn?
MS:
It was slightly different because I made a mistake in the first
qualifying session in the second to last corner and ultimately it
influenced the last corner.
Q:
Could you have run a '23'?
MS: No, it was a good lap.
Q:
Regarding the changes in the qualifying format, is there any reason
to keep the first run?
MS: Well, you know, honestly, I think it is you, the media,
and the spectators, wanting something different. There were complaints
two or three years ago and it was changed and then more complaints
and it was changed so this is what we have. And now you complain
again. Yes, maybe it is fair. For us, too, it is not that interesting.
We just sit around and wait.
Q:
Michael, was your car in the same configuration and carrying the
same fuel load for all your fast times?
MS: We developed the set up through the weekend.
Q:
I want to know if you had the same fuel load.
MS: Basically at certain stages you prepare for the race
and at other stages you do other things. But obviously it is not
something I want to go into detail about too much.
Q:
Do you feel a sense of satisfaction, after all that has been written
in the off-season, that you can come here and you and Rubens go
'bang bang' and it is 'situation normal'?
MS: Yes, to some degree. You all know what has been written
over the winter time and to come here and to prove what a fantastic
job the engineers and everyone in the factory has done and to put
it into a result as we do here is a great satisfaction, but I don't
want to be too ambitious because I know it is going to be a tough
season. Other races will suit us less well than this one.
Q:
At one stage we had eight drivers, separated by seven tenths and
drivers from five different teams. Is that the face of Formula One
this year?
RB: You mean the first session. I don't think you can see
anything. You have the choice of low fuel or high fuel, so people
doing that just equalised each other. I don't think it tells you
too much.
Q:
Do you think it is likely we will see some four-stop strategies?
MS: If you have strange weather or safety cars, perhaps,
but not in a normal race.
Q:
Michael, (Mr) Ecclestone has been quoted saying it is time for you
to lose your title. Ron Dennis said he is sure you will quit in
2005. Why are so many important people impassioned to have you out
of the game?
MS: First of all, I am pretty aware of what Bernie said
and he said simply that he thinks Raikkonen is a great contender
for the championship, not that I should not win it and it is just
part of the game. And what Ron says is down to him.
Q:
Michael, the GPDA expressed concerns about the inexperienced drivers
on Fridays. Were there any problems?
MS: No, I have to say from my point of view all the drivers
had reasonable experience and did a good job, doing things in the
right way.
Q:
Any problems for either of you two?
MS: Yes, there are some experienced drivers who sometimes
stay in the way.
RB: Yes, I had more problems on that side too! (hinting that Montoya
was one...laughter)
Q:
Michael, are you not concerned that the 'ring master' comes out
and says when Ferrari are dominating again that 'it is a disaster'.
MS: Ok.
Q:
What do you think about that? Are you disappointed?
MS: Listen, you won't get a quote from me on this one...
Q:
Gotta try. ...Well, did you think the first qualifying run was useful?
MS: To quote him, basically, he said it is 'too long a
thing' and I agree.
Q:
Is it more important to have a lap in the configuration for the
second run, that counts, rather than track position by taking fuel
out on the first run? Will that change from circuit to circuit?
(After delay and silence)
RB: I was just waiting...
RB: It is too early to say. To be honest, I didn't like the first
run. There was no need to go fast if you see what I mean. I would
rather try hard on Friday because it is something and it is part
of the weekend and today I didn't feel I had to push. Okay, I had
to come out first when the track was dirty and dusty and so on but
I didn't feel like pushing.