|
|
|
| British
Grand Prix 17th - 20th July - Friday Press Conference |
Length:
5.141 km
Number of Laps: 60
(308.355 Km)
Best Lap: R. Barrichello
- 1'23''083 (2002, Ferrari)
Record Pole: J-P.
Montoya - 1'18''998 (2002, BMW Williams)
2002 Pole: J-P. Montoya
- 1'18''998 (BMW Williams)
2002 Podium: M. Schumacher
- R. Barrichello - J-P. Montoya
|
Q:
A question for all of you: people are talking about an engine capacity
cut to slow down the cars. Is that the best way to slow down the cars?
Ross Brawn: I think there is, as Patrick said, a feeling
that it would be nice to moderate the engines a bit. When we started
with this formula, we probably had around 700/750 horsepower, approaching
900 now. I think stability is there until 2007 and for sure it's going
to be 950, maybe even 1000 by then, so with a wish to slow the cars
down, it's certainly one of the things that needs to be considered
very seriously. Unfortunately, there's.. my phone. (Laughter). Sorry,
I'll turn it off, as I should have done when I came in. For us, the
easiest way is to lop two cylinders off the back of the engine, so
now there's a formula of three litres, ten cylinders
RB: With three litres, ten cylinders it would seem to be 2.4 litres,
eight cylinders because it would mean that the combustion, the piston,
the valves, all those things would stay the same and there is a general
agreement that 2.4/2.5 would be an appropriate reduction, but some
of the engine suppliers have, let's say, marketing policies which
revolve around the V10 so it's difficult to get agreement because
for us to do a V10 small capacity would be a pretty expensive exercise.
It would be a high revving engine, a higher revving engine that we
have now. So it seems difficult to get a solution, but it's certainly
something that would, without any doubt, reduce the performance of
the cars. It's a fact, whereas a lot of the other proposals we're
debating are a little uncertain as to what result they would have.
Q:
Onto another subject, to all of you, once again: there are proposals
to change the format of a race weekend. How would that affect your
tasks, particularly the design of a car?
RB: I think there's a fairly critical decision on the format
of racing which is this concept of keeping the fuel for qualifying
and racing because that, by definition, ties you into a one lap
qualifying, because you couldn't logically have a series of qualifying
laps and have fuel for qualifying and the race. So if you follow
a little bit of a logical diagram, I don't think the decision that
has to be considered is whether the fuel for qualifying and the
race is a good thing, because it ties you into several things. I
think the unfortunate thing about it is that it was perceived as
a way to give lesser teams a bit of a moment in the spotlight because
they could run light to succeed in qualifying etc. I don't see that.
I think they're still sensible enough to realize that would be a
very short term gain. And I think after a year of racing this year,
we will find next year that everyone's following the same pattern
of qualifying weight and race weight. I'm not sure that that side
of it is working so well
because what did happen last year, even though it was an unusual
year from our side, you started the race with several cars on different
strategies and different types or tyre and so on, you saw a lot
of overtaking at the beginning of the race because cars were on
different strategies. You don't get that any more. By definition,
the race starts with the teams in the order of their relative speeds
so the guy at the front, even more so than it used to be, the guy
at the front's got a certain level of fuel, a certain speed, and
the guy behind him is a little bit slower and so on and so on. You
can't apply different strategies. The problem is that affects the
design of the car. Your original question was how is the design
of the car influenced by the format and that's the main thing, because
the fuel capacity is determined by the regulation we have and I
think people will be moving towards small capacity cars and then
it will be very difficult to reverse their concept and I think that's
the first thing: we have to decide if it's working, because once
we can decide if that's working, then it either opens up or closes
down a number of other possibilities.
I think the jury's out on the one lap qualifying.
I have to say I was very keen on it, I thought it would be a good
move but I'm not so sure now that it's been, certainly for us, has
been so successful as a spectacle. I'm sure the smaller teams get
a bit more TV coverage, but in terms of a spectacle, it doesn't
seem to be capturing the public's imagination. I think the one lap
qualifying needs to be considered - whether it's been a success
or not.
Q:
Another question to you all: how do you find Silverstone as a facility
to work in?
RB: I think the facilities are very good. The size of the
garage and all of that side of things is excellent. I don't know
if you experienced it, but it was a bit difficult getting in this
morning, on the A43, so not all the problems have been solved, but
as a facility for the teams, certainly for us, to work in, it's
as good as any other circuit, no doubt.
Q:
Ross, there is a rumour going round that Bridgestone have sent a
letter to Ferrari asking Felipe Massa to be taken off tyre testing.
It sounds like you have never heard that one before, but is that
the truth?
RB: I don't know who writes your questions for you but
you need to get a better scriptwriter because I think that is the
least factual question of all the ones you have asked. Felipe is
a very good test driver, he gives good information and, in fact,
we are lucky in that we have four drivers that give very good information
and we have very little preference over who does what. There is
often an occasion when we are picking a final tyre for a race and
we will ask a race driver, or both race drivers, to make that final
decision, and that is what happened last week. But if you will excuse
my language, that is complete bullshit.
Questions
from the Floor
Q:
Ross, Rubens has been struggling a little bit. What has been happening
with him?
RB:
It has just been a few unfortunate circumstances and there is a
very fine line between success and failure in this business as we
have seen from last year to this year with our team. There are far
more people capable of filling the top six positions in the race
so if you make a little mistake or error at the moment then you
lose it. Last year, Rubens started this race in last position and
came second. You can't do that at the moment and if you have a glitch
or a problem then you are out of the running. He has had a few little
unfortunate events. What often happens is it seems to fall to one
driver in a team and it looks very odd but I think all the things
that have happened.. his qualifying at the last race, there was
an adjustment made between warm-up and the race (means qualifying)
that was not correct and that caught him out in qualifying. So then
he started a bit further back than he should have been and his race
became very difficult. There is a very fine line at the moment and
it is a more normal year in that respect. Rubens is a very good
driver and he is obviously being compared to Michael, who is exceptional,
exceptional for the last several generations, so he has a tough
job in that respect but we are happy with Rubens' performance and
if we get our package more competitive then Rubens would be doing
a similar or better performance than he did last year.
|
|
|